Chat Politics.ie and its scam posters. Lets apply the valamhic test.

Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Aug 14, 2020
Messages
243
Likes
77
No we cannot have him and his sock accounts back here. You can chat with him and them on his own site.
Btw, I wasn't suggesting that he be able to write here.. I was suggesting that he would be un-IP-banned, you know, readonly
 

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
Btw, I wasn't suggesting that he be able to write here.. I was suggesting that he would be un-IP-banned, you know, readonly
Read and right.

Here is a post yesterday om PI Gemma thread by page 61


page61

PI Member

JoinedMay 25, 2018Messages3,723Likes 3,719LocationEire

O'Doherty should take the hint and go live in a sanatorium somewhere obscure for the rest of her days.


Pure Mowl!
 
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Aug 14, 2020
Messages
243
Likes
77
Read and right.

Here is a post yesterday om PI Gemma thread by page 61


page61

PI Member

JoinedMay 25, 2018Messages3,723Likes 3,719LocationEire

O'Doherty should take the hint and go live in a sanatorium somewhere obscure for the rest of her days.


Pure Mowl!
Wait, what, page61?

Isn't he just a semi-literate atheist with a short fuse?
 

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
Here is one from Godsdog. on Gemma

Gemma is plucky and some of her earlier investigative journalism had merit,
but the lady has clearly gone a little bonkers and been influenced far too much by US youtube conspiracy videos
and she is now a liability to any serious movement.

She has become the Irish David Icke.

In fact at this stage (as with David Icke) she's become the perfect guided political missile to destroy the credibility of anyone trying
to genuinely protest something wrong going on in our society.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note the careful distance between him and Mowl, but the opinion of her is exactly the same. Mowl Godsdog and Page 61 are the same poster.
 

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
I'm not sure Val you'd have to ask him
When you catch a thief in you house making off with you cash, you don't ask him why he is doing it and if he is doing it.

The fact is so called posters were debating with at least 6 socks on PI for months and never suspected anything. These are the ones I can find ojur about and it takes a few days for every one.
 

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
Wait, what, page61?

Isn't he just a semi-literate atheist with a short fuse?
No, he is Mowl's sock. I have put forward a lit of evidence on Page 61 but he is not the only one.

Here is a post by Gidsdoig to day.

neither are whack job conspiracy theories such as "viruses do not exist"! He is generally talking about Gemma type characters

This is obviously Mowl true and true
 
Last edited:

Thelasthurrah

Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 25, 2020
Messages
283
Likes
97
Here is a post from page 61 of PI.

I hope the people involved know that the general public do not see 3 groups. They see one .
The only good thing I have read is someone wants to distance their group from mad cow O'Doherty ..


Note he read it, he was not at the protest. Not a lot but he lives in Finland. Note the word "COW" He is obsessed with cows and their excrement. Note he calls Gemma mad and Mowl have described here as a nut job requiring treatment under the mental health acts. Everything here aligns with the valamhic test.
The flaw here Val is that most people refer to Gemtrails as that " mad cow" O' Doherty. How could one do otherwise in fairness.
 

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
The valamhic test was applied to wolf on PI , He scored 32% for a Mowl sock
 

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
The flaw here Val is that most people refer to Gemtrails as that " mad cow" O' Doherty. How could one do otherwise in fairness.
I was one of the first to point out those flaws and was banned at least once for doing so. Since then most have recognized what I said to be true.

The valamhic test ( soon to be upgraded to the valamhic dynamic test) does not take account of the politics, mentality of traits of the subject being discussed. So Gemma is simple the rabbit by which the hound dog is assessed. In this example she is the ball in the game of football. The commentator may say the ball is wet or dry but that is all.

The test examines the principle poster's posts and as many of them as possible over a long period of time profiling style, syntax, sympathies,
idiosyncrasies. even such things at a dislike of prawns, coke, sexuality, people, do they drive? do they fish? films liked, music liked./disliked.

illnesses suffered, medical experience, piles. Attitude to Ireland, place where living.

Not only are these assessed, but their absence is assessed. Do they ever let slip where they live and if not why?

The result is a set of positive attributes and the absence of any information on attributes. Each one is assigned a weigh between 0 and 100 %.

Example:

Mowl is from Dublin and lives in Helsinki Finland = 100%

Godsdog never says where he/she is, = -3%

" Hates Trump = - 10%
" Hates valamhic (not rare) = - 5%
" Hates Dan = - 3%
" Likes cats and dogs but not cows = - 8%

" Supports Finn Fein = - 13.5% ( half of the parties support because it is not representative of the population.

Says Gemma is a nut job = - 7%

Short sharp style of posting with a hurried tilt = - 15%

Occasional very long posts = -9%

Obsession with anything (slurry etc) = -20%


Now we are at 93 and 1/2 and a half. This is only an example and not real.

For example Ollie poster to a ridiculous amount about slurry, yet could not discuss it at all. He was anti Justin Barrett and Trump. Eventually the test proved 100% that he was Mowl and Lowl could not post him again because he was just on about a narrow range of posts so he had to drop him. He is gone. The other thing is that as I post I am near to proof, the sock has to be pulled down and that is more evidence.

It is equal to fingerprinting. Foolproof except a bigger sample is needed.
 
Last edited:
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Aug 14, 2020
Messages
243
Likes
77
I was one of the first to point out those flaws and was banned at least once for doing so. Since then most have recognized what I said to be true.

The valamhic test ( soon to be upgraded to the valamhic dynamic test) does not take account of the politics, mentality of traits of the subject being discussed. So Gemma is simple the rabbit by which the hound dog is assessed. In this example she is the ball in the game of football. The commentator may say the ball is wet or dry but that is all.

The test examines the principle poster's posts and as many of them as possible over a long period of time profiling style, syntax, sympathies,
idiosyncrasies. even such things at a dislike of prawns, coke, sexuality, people, do they drive? do they fish? films liked, music liked./disliked.

illnesses suffered, medical experience, piles. Attitude to Ireland, place where living.

Not only are these assessed, but their absence is assessed. Do they ever let slip where they live and if not why?

The result is a set of positive attributes and the absence of any information on attributes. Each one is assigned a weigh between 0 and 100 %.

Example:

Mowl is from Dublin and lives in Helsinki Finland = 100%

Godsdog never says where he/she is, = -3%

" Hates Trump = - 10%
" Hates valamhic (not rare) = - 5%
" Hates Dan = - 3%
" Likes cats and dogs but not cows = - 8%

" Supports Finn Fein = - 13.5% ( half of the parties support because it is not representative of the population.

Says Gemma is a nut job = - 7%

Short sharp style of posting with a hurried tilt = - 15%

Occasional very long posts = -9%

Obsession with anything (slurry etc) = -20%


Now we are at 93 and 1/2 and a half. This is only an example and not real.

For example Ollie poster to a ridiculous amount about slurry, yet could not discuss it at all. He was anti Justin Barrett and Trump. Eventually the test proved 100% that he was Mowl and Lowl could not post him again because he was just on about a narrow range of posts so he had to drop him. He is gone. The other thing is that as I post I am near to proof, the sock has to be pulled down and that is more evidence.

It is equal to fingerprinting. Foolproof except a bigger sample is needed.
Those are some very precise mathematical calculations Val
 

Youngdan

Staff member
Admin
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Yesterday, 23:23
Joined
Feb 14, 2020
Messages
1,266
Likes
509
Valamhic may have workedon The Manhattan Project and is too modest to boost because he is a whiz with figures. Valstein.
 

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
Those are some very precise mathematical calculations Val
The method up to now just test two (one being the principal and the other being the suspected sock). Log tables are used. My new method
will use venn diagrammes and can handle three (principal and 2 suspected socks). If 4 are to be tested (one principle and 3 suspected socks a scientific calaulator may be needed.

Get a piece of paper and write down 10 attributes of your self down along

1) Recent temperature favorable of not

2)Favorite make of car

3) Like Trump

4) Like cooking programmes.

5)Like mustard

6)Hate mice

7) Love dogs in the house

8) Drive fast yes/no

9) Like para Olympics

10) favour conservatism or socialism.

Change these as you like. Now get the wife of someone else to comment on these and you will get the idea.

Have false teeth could be one. If you and the wife visited the Pyramids of Egypt, them don't put this question in as it will
get the same answer and be void.
 

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
Last edited:

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
This is the 3 circle type.

 
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Aug 14, 2020
Messages
243
Likes
77
I may not agree a hundred percent with your detective work Val but I don't question your methodology.

Sadly, I recall you saying that light "bends" (in direction) and changes speed. Those were schoolboy errors
 

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
Valamhic may have workedon The Manhattan Project and is too modest to boost because he is a whiz with figures. Valstein.
Two patients are in one bed room in a hospital, what is the probability that they will have the same birthday?

The probability on Tom having a birthday is 100%, say its the 15th September. The probability of Ned not having a birthday on the same date
is 364/365 X 100 = 99.726% Therefore the probability of Ned having the same birthday as Tom is 100 - 99.726 = ,274%
 
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Aug 14, 2020
Messages
243
Likes
77
Two patients are in one bed room in a hospital, what is the probability that they will have the same birthday?

The probability on Tom having a birthday is 100%, say its the 15th September. The probability of Ned not having a birthday on the same date
is 364/365 X 100 = 99.726% Therefore the probability of Ned having the same birthday as Tom is 100 - 99.726 = ,274%
1/365 = 0.27%.. is a slightly shorter way to arrive at that figure
 

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
I may not agree a hundred percent with your detective work Val but I don't question your methodology.

Sadly, I recall you saying that light "bends" (in direction) and changes speed. Those were schoolboy errors
I am not sure what I said. but light is just as susceptible to gravity as anything else. Nothing larger than an atom can avoid gravity and no sub atomic particle can escape gravity. That includes electro magnetic radiation of which light is a form. The proof is that light leaving a black hole is prevented from escaping from the black hole and we can never see it. There is no greater reduction in speed than to stop altogether and (although it is never observed) to be pulled back into its source.

If light leaves a distant source "A" it travels through the vacuum at SOL. If it encounters a massive object like a large star "B" in its path it will be pulled right into it (the portion on that path) The proof is an eclipse of the moon coming between the sun and earth. The portion of the light that is not on a collision path with the star "B" may bend due to the gravitational pull of the star and set off towards us on a new path so we can see it.

If that star "B" were not there, it would take 1,000,000 light years to reach us.

The existence of the star "B" gives a path in the shape of an obtuse triangle. The long side being the direct line and the other two sides being the actual length the light has to travel. The bent light takes longer to arrive to us, but its speed never alters, it just travels a longer journey.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Say the hypotenuse XY is 1,000.000 light years away and it runs through the large star "B" to us. Say the opposite side is X M and is 508.000 light years with its apex at star "B" (90 degrees). The sq on the hypotenuse = 1,000,000,000,000 LY. Then 508,000 squared = 258,064,000,000. LY.
take XM from XY = 741,936,000,000 get sq route of that = 861,357 + 508,000 = 1,369,357.

Simply put on a straight line it will take 1,000,000 LY to reach us and with the object in the way, 1.360,000 LY. The light travels a longer distance.

It is the same as if there was a mirror where the light bends and it reflected the light towards us. The light would travel to the mirror and on to us (not in a direct line)
 
Last edited:

valamhic

Legal Advisor
Staff member
Member
Trusted Member
Local time
Today, 04:23
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Messages
1,991
Likes
321
1/365 = 0.27%.. is a slightly shorter way to arrive at that figure
Except its not correct, the answer is .274%. In a class in another town there are 30 students. What is the probability of at least 2 having the same birthday?
 
Last edited:
Top